[PULL][Zesty] arm64 fixes for zesty

Seth Forshee seth.forshee at canonical.com
Thu Mar 9 13:11:45 UTC 2017

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:04:06PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:59:59PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >> Here's a set of miscellaneous arm64 changes for zesty. It includes
> >> fixes (erratum/quirking) for the QDF2400 platform, a follow-up fix for
> >> the previously merged VFIO backport, and a GICv3 ITS performance fix.
> >
> > These patches all need buglinks, otherwise they look fine.
> Ah, OK. I'll file bugs and resubmit. Also, I should probably know this
> by now, but at what stage in the release does the buglink requirement
> set in? I think historically I've used lazy discovery by submitted
> cherry-picks w/o buglinks until I get an e-mail like this one, then
> transition to buglink mode for the rest of the cycle :)

You should have buglinks for everything after feature freeze. There's no
reason you can't include them before then though ;-)

More information about the kernel-team mailing list