[PATCH] acpi: apei: check for pending errors when probing GHES entries

[Manoj Iyer]

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Seth Forshee 
<seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:18:38AM -0500, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>>  On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Seth Forshee 
>> <seth.forshee at canonical.com>
>>  wrote:
>>  > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:50:15PM -0500, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>>  > >  From: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar at codeaurora.org>
>>  > >
>>  > >  Check for pending errors when probing GHES entries. It is 
>> possible
>>  > >  that a fatal error is already pending at this point, so we 
>> should
>>  > >  handle it as soon as the driver is probed. This also avoids a
>>  > >  potential issue if there was an interrupt that was already
>>  > >  cleared for an error since the GHES driver wasn't present.
>>  > >
>>  > >  BugLink: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1698448
>>  > >
>>  > >  Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar at codeaurora.org>
>>  > >  Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
>>  > >  Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
>>  > >  (cherry picked from commit 
>> f561618d9b8019d3590950f19e2f75f9e20ed0c7)
>>  >
>>  > Where did this patch come from? I can't find this sha1 or any 
>> commit
>>  > with this subject in Linus' tree. If it came from somewhere else 
>> you
>>  > need to indicate where.
>> 
>>  I mentioned this in my cover letter to the patch that this is from 
>> Will
>>  Deacon's arm64 for-next git repo.
>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git.
> 
> Okay, so then your cherry picked statement should look like this:
> 
> (cherry picked from commit f561618d9b8019d3590950f19e2f75f9e20ed0c7
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git)
> 
> or perhaps just (cherry picked from ... linux-next) since it's likely
> the commit is also in linux-next. A sha1 by itself isn't useful, we 
> also
> need the repository it came from, and someone looking at the tree 
> isn't
> going to have the context of the cover letter. When you cherry pick it
> from anywhere but Linus' tree you need to include that information.

Looks like the same applys for the RAS patches I sent out previously .. 
only the cover letter has the repo info.. did you want me to resubmit 
these with repo added?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20170620/905285a0/attachment.html>