[PATCH v2 0/2] [SRU Y/Z/A] Enable APST for more NVMe

Kai-Heng Feng kai.heng.feng at canonical.com
Fri Jul 7 05:36:34 UTC 2017


>>
>> You are right. We shouldn't expect users to tweak the knob if
>> regression happens.
>>
>> Once Artful is released and being used by more audience without major
>> regression, will it be a "good enough" indication to backport APST to
>> older kernel?
>
> In general I'd say yes. If we can point at artful a couple months after
> release and say, "this didn't cause users lots of problems, and we have
> fixes for the problems it did cause," then that would be good enough to
> say that there's a reasonably low regression risk.
>

That's good to hear. I'll resend the patch series after APST is
settled down in Artful.

Thanks.




More information about the kernel-team mailing list