[SRU][Zesty][PATCH 1/1] Revert "vhost: cache used event for better performance"

Seth Forshee seth.forshee at canonical.com
Mon Aug 28 14:05:25 UTC 2017

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:14:28AM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 08/28/2017 08:54 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:07:55PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> >> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1711251
> >>
> >> This reverts commit 809ecb9bca6a9424ccd392d67e368160f8b76c92.
> > I'm curious why you reverted directly instead of cherry picking the
> > upstream revert. In either case the patch needs your sign-off, which is
> > missing here.
> Cherry picking the revert from upstream was not clean and required a
> backport.  However, If I did the revert directly to Zesty it was clean. 
> Do you think it would be better to cherry pick from upstream and back port?

No, that's a good enough reason. However I think it probably does need
to be marked as sauce in that case, and I think it would be useful to
mention the upstream commit and the reason for not cherry picking it in
the patch description.

More information about the kernel-team mailing list