[PATCH Xenial SRU] UBUNTU: [Config] Remove arc4 from nic-modules
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Wed May 25 15:20:23 UTC 2016
On 05/25/2016 09:06 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:57:06AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> On 05/25/2016 01:06 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:46:54PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582991
>>>>
>>>> It seems a little odd to have a crypto module in
>>>> with the NICS, even if it is a dependent module.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> debian.master/d-i/modules/nic-modules | 1 -
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/debian.master/d-i/modules/nic-modules b/debian.master/d-i/modules/nic-modules
>>>> index bd6e37a..681ce7c 100644
>>>> --- a/debian.master/d-i/modules/nic-modules
>>>> +++ b/debian.master/d-i/modules/nic-modules
>>>> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ airport ?
>>>> alx ?
>>>> amd8111e ?
>>>> aquantia ?
>>>> -arc4 ?
>>>> arcnet ?
>>>> arc-rawmode ?
>>>> arc-rimi ?
>>>
>>> These are d-i fixes. As the debian-installer is not respun in the older
>>> releases in general, I am not sure these will ever have any effect? The
>>> Xenial one might for 16.04.1 other than that not.
>>>
>>> -apw
>>>
>>
>> I thought the net install bits got respun for each new kernel.
>
> A good point well made.
>
> Did you confirm that the nic-modules depends on the foo-modules in which
> arc4 is shipped?
>
> -apw
>
I have a vague recollection that kernel-wedge satisfies symbolic
linkages at udeb creation time. Regardless, though, arc4 registers
indirectly with the crypto engine so there can be no direct symbolic
linkage with consumers of the "ARC4 Cipher Algorithm". As long as
crypto-modules is included in d-i then all should be well.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list