Disposition of powernv patches

[Tim Gardner]

Upon some reflection I dropped the 3 SAUCE patches and applied the 2
replacements from patchworks. If they get merged unmolested then they
should fall away naturally on a rebase during the 4.7 cycle.

rtg

On 05/16/2016 07:06 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> I guess I should expect these SAUCE patches to conflict sometime during
> the 4.7 cycle. Thanks for the update.
> 
> rtg
> 
> On 05/14/2016 10:39 PM, Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar wrote:
>> On 05/13/2016 02:34 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>> Let's wait Mahesh opinion here, but I understand that this patch will be
>>> redone, as Mahesh talked to the PPC kernel maintainer.
>>
>> All fault is mine. I apologize. Paul's reply somehow slipped under my
>> nose.. I have sent out v2 with minor changes as suggested by Paul and
>> should be good to go in upstream. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't
>> hit to upstream. Lets wait for a while.
>>
>> V2 patches are here:
>>
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-May/143147.html
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-May/143148.html
>>
>> Tim, the change in v2 is very minor. it just makes the
>> kvmppc_realmode_hmi_handler() function to take no arguments and folds
>> patch 3/3 into 2/3. And this change does not cause any functionality change.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Mahesh.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/12/2016 05:45 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>>> This patch does not appear to be making its way upstream. Please advise.
>>>>
>>>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/rtg/ubuntu-unstable.git/commit/?h=SAUCE&id=9018ff857ff9e6fee54c3f965dc93ba8d018465f
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nor are these patches evident in linux-next:
>>>>
>>>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/rtg/ubuntu-unstable.git/commit/?h=SAUCE&id=f5af2c811c2a0ee18d95d2542b8ced11a54b596f
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/rtg/ubuntu-unstable.git/commit/?h=SAUCE&id=6b9cbfbfbccfd83cc4f97e7a6025aed5c678cf23
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rtg
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com