Disposition of powernv patches
Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sun May 15 04:39:16 UTC 2016
On 05/13/2016 02:34 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Let's wait Mahesh opinion here, but I understand that this patch will be
> redone, as Mahesh talked to the PPC kernel maintainer.
All fault is mine. I apologize. Paul's reply somehow slipped under my
nose.. I have sent out v2 with minor changes as suggested by Paul and
should be good to go in upstream. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't
hit to upstream. Lets wait for a while.
V2 patches are here:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-May/143147.html
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-May/143148.html
Tim, the change in v2 is very minor. it just makes the
kvmppc_realmode_hmi_handler() function to take no arguments and folds
patch 3/3 into 2/3. And this change does not cause any functionality change.
Thanks,
-Mahesh.
>
>
> On 05/12/2016 05:45 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> This patch does not appear to be making its way upstream. Please advise.
>>
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/rtg/ubuntu-unstable.git/commit/?h=SAUCE&id=9018ff857ff9e6fee54c3f965dc93ba8d018465f
>>
>>
>>
>> Nor are these patches evident in linux-next:
>>
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/rtg/ubuntu-unstable.git/commit/?h=SAUCE&id=f5af2c811c2a0ee18d95d2542b8ced11a54b596f
>>
>>
>>
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/rtg/ubuntu-unstable.git/commit/?h=SAUCE&id=6b9cbfbfbccfd83cc4f97e7a6025aed5c678cf23
>>
>>
>>
>> rtg
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list