[SRU][Wily][PATCH] sched/numa: Fix use-after-free bug in the task_numa_compare
Gavin Guo
gavin.guo at canonical.com
Sat Mar 12 14:09:12 UTC 2016
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527643
The following message can be observed on the Ubuntu v3.13.0-65 with KASan
backported:
==================================================================
BUG: KASan: use after free in task_numa_find_cpu+0x64c/0x890 at addr ffff880dd393ecd8
Read of size 8 by task qemu-system-x86/3998900
=============================================================================
BUG kmalloc-128 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO: Allocated in task_numa_fault+0xc1b/0xed0 age=41980 cpu=18 pid=3998890
__slab_alloc+0x4f8/0x560
__kmalloc+0x1eb/0x280
task_numa_fault+0xc1b/0xed0
do_numa_page+0x192/0x200
handle_mm_fault+0x808/0x1160
__do_page_fault+0x218/0x750
do_page_fault+0x1a/0x70
page_fault+0x28/0x30
SyS_poll+0x66/0x1a0
system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
INFO: Freed in task_numa_free+0x1d2/0x200 age=62 cpu=18 pid=0
__slab_free+0x2ab/0x3f0
kfree+0x161/0x170
task_numa_free+0x1d2/0x200
finish_task_switch+0x1d2/0x210
__schedule+0x5d4/0xc60
schedule_preempt_disabled+0x40/0xc0
cpu_startup_entry+0x2da/0x340
start_secondary+0x28f/0x360
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81a6ce35>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
[<ffffffff81244aed>] print_trailer+0xfd/0x170
[<ffffffff8124ac36>] object_err+0x36/0x40
[<ffffffff8124cbf9>] kasan_report_error+0x1e9/0x3a0
[<ffffffff8124d260>] kasan_report+0x40/0x50
[<ffffffff810dda7c>] ? task_numa_find_cpu+0x64c/0x890
[<ffffffff8124bee9>] __asan_load8+0x69/0xa0
[<ffffffff814f5c38>] ? find_next_bit+0xd8/0x120
[<ffffffff810dda7c>] task_numa_find_cpu+0x64c/0x890
[<ffffffff810de16c>] task_numa_migrate+0x4ac/0x7b0
[<ffffffff810de523>] numa_migrate_preferred+0xb3/0xc0
[<ffffffff810e0b88>] task_numa_fault+0xb88/0xed0
[<ffffffff8120ef02>] do_numa_page+0x192/0x200
[<ffffffff81211038>] handle_mm_fault+0x808/0x1160
[<ffffffff810d7dbd>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x10d/0x160
[<ffffffff81068c52>] ? native_load_tls+0x82/0xa0
[<ffffffff81a7bd68>] __do_page_fault+0x218/0x750
[<ffffffff810c2186>] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x76/0x160
[<ffffffff81a6f5e7>] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.part.24+0xf7/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81a7c2ba>] do_page_fault+0x1a/0x70
[<ffffffff81a772e8>] page_fault+0x28/0x30
[<ffffffff8128cbd4>] ? do_sys_poll+0x1c4/0x6d0
[<ffffffff810e64f6>] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x4b6/0xaa0
[<ffffffff810233c9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff810cf70a>] ? resched_task+0x7a/0xc0
[<ffffffff810d0663>] ? check_preempt_curr+0xb3/0x130
[<ffffffff8128b5c0>] ? poll_select_copy_remaining+0x170/0x170
[<ffffffff810d3bc0>] ? wake_up_state+0x10/0x20
[<ffffffff8112a28f>] ? drop_futex_key_refs.isra.14+0x1f/0x90
[<ffffffff8112d40e>] ? futex_requeue+0x3de/0xba0
[<ffffffff8112e49e>] ? do_futex+0xbe/0x8f0
[<ffffffff81022c89>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x20
[<ffffffff8111bd9d>] ? ktime_get_ts+0x12d/0x170
[<ffffffff8108f699>] ? timespec_add_safe+0x59/0xe0
[<ffffffff8128d1f6>] SyS_poll+0x66/0x1a0
[<ffffffff81a830dd>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
As commit 1effd9f19324 ("sched/numa: Fix unsafe get_task_struct() in
task_numa_assign()") points out, the rcu_read_lock() cannot protect the
task_struct from being freed in the finish_task_switch(). And the bug
happens in the process of calculation of imp which requires the access of
p->numa_faults being freed in the following path:
do_exit()
current->flags |= PF_EXITING;
release_task()
~~delayed_put_task_struct()~~
schedule()
...
...
rq->curr = next;
context_switch()
finish_task_switch()
put_task_struct()
__put_task_struct()
task_numa_free()
The fix here to get_task_struct() early before end of dst_rq->lock to
protect the calculation process and also put_task_struct() in the
corresponding point if finally the dst_rq->curr somehow cannot be
assigned.
Additional credit to Liang Chen who helped fix the error logic and add the
put_task_struct() to the place it missed.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavin.guo at canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman at suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel at redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
Cc: jay.vosburgh at canonical.com
Cc: liang.chen at canonical.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453264618-17645-1-git-send-email-gavin.guo@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1dff76b92f69051e579bdc131e01500da9fa2a91)
Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavin.guo at canonical.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d113c3ba8bc4..4251b2656b11 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1187,8 +1187,6 @@ static void task_numa_assign(struct task_numa_env *env,
{
if (env->best_task)
put_task_struct(env->best_task);
- if (p)
- get_task_struct(p);
env->best_task = p;
env->best_imp = imp;
@@ -1256,20 +1254,30 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
long imp = env->p->numa_group ? groupimp : taskimp;
long moveimp = imp;
int dist = env->dist;
+ bool assigned = false;
rcu_read_lock();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&dst_rq->lock);
cur = dst_rq->curr;
/*
- * No need to move the exiting task, and this ensures that ->curr
- * wasn't reaped and thus get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign()
- * is safe under RCU read lock.
- * Note that rcu_read_lock() itself can't protect from the final
- * put_task_struct() after the last schedule().
+ * No need to move the exiting task or idle task.
*/
if ((cur->flags & PF_EXITING) || is_idle_task(cur))
cur = NULL;
+ else {
+ /*
+ * The task_struct must be protected here to protect the
+ * p->numa_faults access in the task_weight since the
+ * numa_faults could already be freed in the following path:
+ * finish_task_switch()
+ * --> put_task_struct()
+ * --> __put_task_struct()
+ * --> task_numa_free()
+ */
+ get_task_struct(cur);
+ }
+
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dst_rq->lock);
/*
@@ -1353,6 +1361,7 @@ balance:
*/
if (!load_too_imbalanced(src_load, dst_load, env)) {
imp = moveimp - 1;
+ put_task_struct(cur);
cur = NULL;
goto assign;
}
@@ -1378,9 +1387,16 @@ balance:
env->dst_cpu = select_idle_sibling(env->p, env->dst_cpu);
assign:
+ assigned = true;
task_numa_assign(env, cur, imp);
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
+ /*
+ * The dst_rq->curr isn't assigned. The protection for task_struct is
+ * finished.
+ */
+ if (cur && !assigned)
+ put_task_struct(cur);
}
static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
--
2.0.0
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list