[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 035/126] FS-Cache: Add missing initialization of ret in cachefiles_write_page()

[Luis Henriques]

3.16.7-ckt22 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>

commit cf89752645e47d86ba8a4157f4b121fcb33434c5 upstream.

fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c: In function ‘cachefiles_write_page’:
fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c:882: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in
this function

If the jump to label "error" is taken, "ret" will indeed be
uninitialized, and random stack data may be printed by the debug code.

Fixes: 102f4d900c9c8f5e ("FS-Cache: Handle a write to the page immediately beyond the EOF marker")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
---
 fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
index 88483abe08d3..d2582ebce887 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ int cachefiles_write_page(struct fscache_storage *op, struct page *page)
 	loff_t pos, eof;
 	size_t len;
 	void *data;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = -ENOBUFS;
 
 	ASSERT(op != NULL);
 	ASSERT(page != NULL);