Re: ACK: [PATCH Precise SRO] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.

[Tim Gardner]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/19/2016 06:08 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
> The risk should be limited and also already applied to kernels past
> P.
> 
> Hm, is SRO a new thing of just fat fingers...?
> 
> -Stefan
> 
> 
> 

SRO -> SRU

- -- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=VLEp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----