ACK+Applied, but... : [Patch 0/14] set of fixes to apparmor 3.5-beta1

Kamal Mostafa kamal at canonical.com
Tue Aug 23 17:51:46 UTC 2016


On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:05:40AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> The following is a set of fixes to apparmor 3.5-beta1. The patches are
> also available for request pull

This entire patch set to Xenial, but I'm not sure what to do with most
of the BugLink LP bugs...

These two had the usual "linux (Ubuntu)" task lines so I nominated them
for Xenial and marked them Fix Committed as usual:

    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592547
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593874

But the rest are filed only against "AppArmor" -- they don't have any
"linux" task line.  Do we require them to? (Brad?)

I just left these "AppArmor" bugs alone for now:

    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579135
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615878
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615880
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615881
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615882
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615885
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615887
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615889
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615890
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615892
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615893
    BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615895

 -Kamal




More information about the kernel-team mailing list