ACK+Applied, but... : [Patch 0/14] set of fixes to apparmor 3.5-beta1
Kamal Mostafa
kamal at canonical.com
Tue Aug 23 17:51:46 UTC 2016
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:05:40AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> The following is a set of fixes to apparmor 3.5-beta1. The patches are
> also available for request pull
This entire patch set to Xenial, but I'm not sure what to do with most
of the BugLink LP bugs...
These two had the usual "linux (Ubuntu)" task lines so I nominated them
for Xenial and marked them Fix Committed as usual:
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592547
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593874
But the rest are filed only against "AppArmor" -- they don't have any
"linux" task line. Do we require them to? (Brad?)
I just left these "AppArmor" bugs alone for now:
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579135
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615878
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615880
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615881
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615882
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615885
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615887
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615889
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615890
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615892
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615893
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615895
-Kamal
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list