[3.13.y-ckt stable] Patch "task_work: remove fifo ordering guarantee" has been added to staging queue

[Kamal Mostafa]

This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    task_work: remove fifo ordering guarantee

to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y-ckt extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

    http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-3.13.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.13.11-ckt28.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.13.y-ckt tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

------

>From 9bfd7dca0c9d07667c43b66dc3aae9762a309701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:42:30 -0700
Subject: task_work: remove fifo ordering guarantee
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

commit c82199061009d1561e31e17fca5e47a87cb7ff4c upstream.

In commit f341861fb0b ("task_work: add a scheduling point in
task_work_run()") I fixed a latency problem adding a cond_resched()
call.

Later, commit ac3d0da8f329 added yet another loop to reverse a list,
bringing back the latency spike :

I've seen in some cases this loop taking 275 ms, if for example a
process with 2,000,000 files is killed.

We could add yet another cond_resched() in the reverse loop, or we
can simply remove the reversal, as I do not think anything
would depend on order of task_work_add() submitted works.

Fixes: ac3d0da8f329 ("task_work: Make task_work_add() lockless")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze at google.com>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 kernel/task_work.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
index 8727032..53fa971 100644
--- a/kernel/task_work.c
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ static struct callback_head work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */
  * This is like the signal handler which runs in kernel mode, but it doesn't
  * try to wake up the @task.
  *
+ * Note: there is no ordering guarantee on works queued here.
+ *
  * RETURNS:
  * 0 if succeeds or -ESRCH.
  */
@@ -108,16 +110,6 @@ void task_work_run(void)
 		raw_spin_unlock_wait(&task->pi_lock);
 		smp_mb();

-		/* Reverse the list to run the works in fifo order */
-		head = NULL;
-		do {
-			next = work->next;
-			work->next = head;
-			head = work;
-			work = next;
-		} while (work);
-
-		work = head;
 		do {
 			next = work->next;
 			work->func(work);
--
1.9.1