[3.13.y-ckt stable] Patch "Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" has been added to staging queue

[Kamal Mostafa]

This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it

to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y-ckt extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

    http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-3.13.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.13.11-ckt21.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.13.y-ckt tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

------

>From 97c3d66093260d84488f3e645c27fb87c402f9ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana at suse.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:23:59 +0100
Subject: Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it

commit ccccf3d67294714af2d72a6fd6fd7d73b01c9329 upstream.

If we attempt to clone a 0 length region into a file we can end up
inserting a range in the inode's extent_io tree with a start offset
that is greater then the end offset, which triggers immediately the
following warning:

[ 3914.619057] WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 4199 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3914.620886] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3914.638093] Call Trace:
[ 3914.638636]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3914.639620]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3914.640789]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.642041]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3914.643236]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3914.644441]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3914.645711]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3914.646914]  [<ffffffff8142b2fb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3914.648058]  [<ffffffffa03cbac4>] ? test_range_bit+0xcc/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3914.650105]  [<ffffffffa03cb3c3>] lock_extent+0x13/0x15 [btrfs]
[ 3914.651361]  [<ffffffffa03db39e>] lock_extent_range+0x3d/0xcd [btrfs]
[ 3914.652761]  [<ffffffffa03de1fe>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x278/0x388 [btrfs]
[ 3914.654128]  [<ffffffff811226dd>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[ 3914.655320]  [<ffffffffa03e0909>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x2195 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3914.669271] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc1 ]---

This later makes the inode eviction handler enter an infinite loop that
keeps dumping the following warning over and over:

[ 3915.117629] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4228 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
[ 3915.119913] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
(...)
[ 3915.137394] Call Trace:
[ 3915.137913]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 3915.139154]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[ 3915.140316]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.141505]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[ 3915.142709]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
[ 3915.143849]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
[ 3915.145120]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] ? btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
[ 3915.146352]  [<ffffffff811548f6>] ? deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
[ 3915.147565]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
[ 3915.148785]  [<ffffffff8142b7e2>] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x28/0x33
[ 3915.149931]  [<ffffffffa03bc325>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x196/0x482 [btrfs]
[ 3915.151154]  [<ffffffff81168904>] evict+0xa0/0x148
[ 3915.152094]  [<ffffffff811689e5>] dispose_list+0x39/0x43
[ 3915.153081]  [<ffffffff81169564>] evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb
[ 3915.154062]  [<ffffffff81154418>] generic_shutdown_super+0x49/0xef
[ 3915.155193]  [<ffffffff811546d1>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
[ 3915.156274]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
(...)
[ 3915.167404] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc2 ]---

So just bail out of the clone ioctl if the length of the region to clone
is zero, without locking any extent range, in order to prevent this issue
(same behaviour as a pwrite with a 0 length for example).

This is trivial to reproduce. For example, the steps for the test I just
made for fstests:

  mkfs.btrfs -f SCRATCH_DEV
  mount SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT

  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 4096 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
  umount $SCRATCH_MNT

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana at suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov at osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm at fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index a5f3371..05f5c87 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -3200,6 +3200,11 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_clone(struct file *file, unsigned long srcfd,
 	if (off + len == src->i_size)
 		len = ALIGN(src->i_size, bs) - off;

+	if (len == 0) {
+		ret = 0;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	/* verify the end result is block aligned */
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(off, bs) || !IS_ALIGNED(off + len, bs) ||
 	    !IS_ALIGNED(destoff, bs))
--
1.9.1