[3.13.y-ckt stable] Patch "drm/i915: BDW Fix Halo PCI IDs marked as ULT." has been added to staging queue

[Kamal Mostafa]

This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    drm/i915: BDW Fix Halo PCI IDs marked as ULT.

to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y-ckt extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.13.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.13.11-ckt17.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.13.y-ckt tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

------

>From 35b684b0982e30b08beb07f4aed82f1e5cd13941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:16:15 -0800
Subject: drm/i915: BDW Fix Halo PCI IDs marked as ULT.

commit 6b96d705f3cf435b0b8835b12c9742513c77fed6 upstream.

BDW with PCI-IDs ended in "2" aren't ULT, but HALO.
Let's fix it and at least allow VGA to work on this units.

v2: forgot ammend and v1 doesn't compile

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87220
Cc: Xion Zhang <xiong.y.zhang at intel.com>
Cc: Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
[ kamal: backport to 3.13-stable: context ]
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 73d7bd7..74c2a37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1758,8 +1758,7 @@ struct drm_i915_file_private {
 #define IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev)	(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
 				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)
 #define IS_BDW_ULT(dev)		(IS_BROADWELL(dev) && \
-				 (((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0x2  || \
-				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0x6 || \
+				 (((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0x6  || \
 				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xf) == 0xe))
 #define IS_HSW_ULT(dev)		(IS_HASWELL(dev) && \
 				 ((dev)->pdev->device & 0xFF00) == 0x0A00)
--
1.9.1