[PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 031/251] [media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5
Kamal Mostafa
kamal at canonical.com
Thu Jul 16 01:05:52 UTC 2015
3.19.8-ckt4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= <david at hardeman.nu>
commit 4d298b8539ed59f1d69d3aa6e41a2c4908137612 upstream.
commit af3a4a9bbeb0 ("[media] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup") cleaned
up the NEC scancode logic but overlooked the RC5 case.
This patch brings the RC5 case in line with the NEC code and makes
the struct self-documenting.
Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david at hardeman.nu>
Reported-by: David Cimbůrek <david.cimburek at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
index 50856db..605b090 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
@@ -658,10 +658,20 @@ out:
struct dib0700_rc_response {
u8 report_id;
u8 data_state;
- u8 system;
- u8 not_system;
- u8 data;
- u8 not_data;
+ union {
+ struct {
+ u8 system;
+ u8 not_system;
+ u8 data;
+ u8 not_data;
+ } nec;
+ struct {
+ u8 not_used;
+ u8 system;
+ u8 data;
+ u8 not_data;
+ } rc5;
+ };
};
#define RC_MSG_SIZE_V1_20 6
@@ -697,8 +707,8 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb)
deb_data("IR ID = %02X state = %02X System = %02X %02X Cmd = %02X %02X (len %d)\n",
poll_reply->report_id, poll_reply->data_state,
- poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system,
- poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data,
+ poll_reply->nec.system, poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+ poll_reply->nec.data, poll_reply->nec.not_data,
purb->actual_length);
switch (d->props.rc.core.protocol) {
@@ -707,30 +717,30 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb)
toggle = 0;
/* NEC protocol sends repeat code as 0 0 0 FF */
- if (poll_reply->system == 0x00 &&
- poll_reply->not_system == 0x00 &&
- poll_reply->data == 0x00 &&
- poll_reply->not_data == 0xff) {
+ if (poll_reply->nec.system == 0x00 &&
+ poll_reply->nec.not_system == 0x00 &&
+ poll_reply->nec.data == 0x00 &&
+ poll_reply->nec.not_data == 0xff) {
poll_reply->data_state = 2;
break;
}
- if ((poll_reply->data ^ poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
+ if ((poll_reply->nec.data ^ poll_reply->nec.not_data) != 0xff) {
deb_data("NEC32 protocol\n");
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->system << 24 |
- poll_reply->not_system << 16 |
- poll_reply->data << 8 |
- poll_reply->not_data);
- } else if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) {
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->nec.system << 24 |
+ poll_reply->nec.not_system << 16 |
+ poll_reply->nec.data << 8 |
+ poll_reply->nec.not_data);
+ } else if ((poll_reply->nec.system ^ poll_reply->nec.not_system) != 0xff) {
deb_data("NEC extended protocol\n");
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->system << 8 |
- poll_reply->not_system,
- poll_reply->data);
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->nec.system << 8 |
+ poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+ poll_reply->nec.data);
} else {
deb_data("NEC normal protocol\n");
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->system,
- poll_reply->data);
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->nec.system,
+ poll_reply->nec.data);
}
break;
@@ -738,19 +748,19 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb)
deb_data("RC5 protocol\n");
protocol = RC_TYPE_RC5;
toggle = poll_reply->report_id;
- keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->system, poll_reply->data);
+ keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->rc5.system, poll_reply->rc5.data);
+
+ if ((poll_reply->rc5.data ^ poll_reply->rc5.not_data) != 0xff) {
+ /* Key failed integrity check */
+ err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
+ poll_reply->rc5.not_used, poll_reply->rc5.system,
+ poll_reply->rc5.data, poll_reply->rc5.not_data);
+ goto resubmit;
+ }
break;
}
- if ((poll_reply->data + poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
- /* Key failed integrity check */
- err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
- poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system,
- poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data);
- goto resubmit;
- }
-
rc_keydown(d->rc_dev, protocol, keycode, toggle);
resubmit:
--
1.9.1
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list