ACK: [PATCH 0/1] LP#1489487 -- linux-meta: is uninstallable in trusty-proposed

Andy Whitcroft apw at canonical.com
Fri Aug 28 10:51:33 UTC 2015


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:17:32PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:03:18AM -0700, Brad Figg wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 04:41:43PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > > It turns out we have some badly linked meta packages in trusty.
> > > Specifically the *-hwe-* auto upgrade variants exist in some flavours
> > > which do not exist on all architectures.  After some discussion it was
> > > decided the -virtual variants should point to -generic where there is no
> > > -virtual binaries.
> > > 
> > > Also there are are no powerpc binaries for -utopic so it makes no sense
> > > to have *-hwe-* variants on that arch.
> > > 
> > > Proposing for SRU to trusty.  We may want to upload just this change
> > > directly into trusty-proposed to allow the packages to become installable.
> > > 
> > > -apw
> > > 
> > > Andy Whitcroft (1):
> > >   UBUNTU: fix linux-*-hwe-* linkage
> > > 
> > >  meta-source/debian/changelog      |  7 +++++++
> > >  meta-source/debian/control.common | 12 ++++++------
> > >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.5.0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > kernel-team mailing list
> > > kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
> > 
> > Not sure what a "dandling" package is but we better get rid of them.
> 
> A dependancy on something which does not exist, in this case a -virtual
> variant of the linux-meta-lts-utopic package for these architectures.

Oh and apparently I am so dyslexic I didn't see the error in your repeat
either.  Yes it should be dangling, derp.

-apw




More information about the kernel-team mailing list