[Utopic][Vivid][PATCH 0/1] n_tty: Fix read buffer overwrite when no newline
Joseph Salisbury
joseph.salisbury at canonical.com
Wed Apr 15 18:54:05 UTC 2015
On 04/15/2015 01:56 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381005
>
> == Utopic and Vivid SRU Justification ==
> Long stdin from terminal(>4096 Characters) can result in code execution.
> Under certain conditions, the input entered from a terminal with a foreground
> process waiting for stdin, can be interpreted and executed by the shell.
> Instead of reading the input, the current program exits (read() only reads one
> character before EOF) and the shell executes the same input starting from the
> second character.
>
> This bug was introduced in v3.12-rc1 when mainline commit 24a89d1 was applied.
>
> Mainline commit fb5ef9e which was introduced in v4.0-rc1 resolves this bug.
> This commit does not cherry-pick cleanly, so I performed a backport for
> Utopic and Vivid. Trusty can not use the backport of fb5ef9e7
> becuase smp_load_acquire was not introduced until 3.14-rc1. I'll look into
> alternative way that this bug could be fixed in Trusty.
>
> I also submitted my backport for inclusion in the vl3.14.y, v3.16.y-ckt, v3.18.y,
> v3.19.y upstream stable kernels. Not requested in upstream v3.12.y or v3.13.y-ckt
> again because smp_load_acquire was not introduced until 3.14-rc1, so an entirly
> different fix is needed for those versions.
>
> == Fix ==
> commit fb5ef9e7da39968fec6d6f37f20a23d23740c75e
> Author: Peter Hurley <peter at hurleysoftware.com>
> Date: Fri Jan 16 15:05:39 2015 -0500
>
> n_tty: Fix read buffer overwrite when no newline
>
>
>
> == Test Case ==
>
> A test kernel was built with this patch and tested by myself and another bug
> commenter. The bug reporter states the test kernel resolved the bug.
>
>
> Peter Hurley (1):
> n_tty: Fix read buffer overwrite when no newline
>
> drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
I received some feed back from upstream regarding my backport. I'll be
changing this a bit, so it shouldn't be applied to Utopic or Vivid yet.
I'll wait from final acks from upstream before sending a V2 SRU request.
Thanks,
Joe
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list