[3.13.y.z extended stable] Patch "block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2" has been added to staging queue

Kamal Mostafa kamal at canonical.com
Tue Oct 21 20:09:31 UTC 2014


This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2

to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y.z extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.13.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.13.11.10.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.13.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

------

>From db78229ed0ae2964a44ebe02c9550c65126e48ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:26:13 -0400
Subject: block: fix alignment_offset math that assumes io_min is a power-of-2

commit b8839b8c55f3fdd60dc36abcda7e0266aff7985c upstream.

The math in both blk_stack_limits() and queue_limit_alignment_offset()
assume that a block device's io_min (aka minimum_io_size) is always a
power-of-2.  Fix the math such that it works for non-power-of-2 io_min.

This issue (of alignment_offset != 0) became apparent when testing
dm-thinp with a thinp blocksize that matches a RAID6 stripesize of
1280K.  Commit fdfb4c8c1 ("dm thin: set minimum_io_size to pool's data
block size") unlocked the potential for alignment_offset != 0 due to
the dm-thin-pool's io_min possibly being a non-power-of-2.

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 block/blk-settings.c   | 4 ++--
 include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 05e8267..b0b1ec6 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
 		bottom = max(b->physical_block_size, b->io_min) + alignment;

 		/* Verify that top and bottom intervals line up */
-		if (max(top, bottom) & (min(top, bottom) - 1)) {
+		if (max(top, bottom) % min(top, bottom)) {
 			t->misaligned = 1;
 			ret = -1;
 		}
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,

 	/* Find lowest common alignment_offset */
 	t->alignment_offset = lcm(t->alignment_offset, alignment)
-		& (max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min) - 1);
+		% max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min);

 	/* Verify that new alignment_offset is on a logical block boundary */
 	if (t->alignment_offset & (t->logical_block_size - 1)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 1b135d4..75fc3a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1238,10 +1238,9 @@ static inline int queue_alignment_offset(struct request_queue *q)
 static inline int queue_limit_alignment_offset(struct queue_limits *lim, sector_t sector)
 {
 	unsigned int granularity = max(lim->physical_block_size, lim->io_min);
-	unsigned int alignment = (sector << 9) & (granularity - 1);
+	unsigned int alignment = sector_div(sector, granularity >> 9) << 9;

-	return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment)
-		& (granularity - 1);
+	return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment) % granularity;
 }

 static inline int bdev_alignment_offset(struct block_device *bdev)
--
1.9.1





More information about the kernel-team mailing list