Fwd: Standard location to install device tree files?
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Fri May 23 01:05:34 UTC 2014
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:51:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:10:45PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Any comments from the Ubuntu side of things, please? Replies should
> > probably go to the cross-distro list, I guess. The thread is at:
> > http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/cross-distro/2014-May/000676.html
> i see two requirements here:
> 1) create a symlink in a fixed location (e.g. /boot/dtb) that points to the
> latest dtbs installment (much like /vmlinuz points to the kernel)
> 2) move dtbs to a filesystem that u-boot can handle (extX or vfat so far)
> to make this effective we need to achieve both (there's little point in
> creating /boot/dtb -> /lib/firmware/etcetc if /lib is an xfs/btrfs filesystem)
> so, IMO, the symlink position is what the cross-distro ml should pick,
> while we as a distribution, should move the dtbs to a place that u-boot
> can always access
> any thoughts on this?
Riku brought this up for discussion on #debian-arm the other day, and I
argued against this proposal as an attempt to standardize something that
doesn't need to be standardized. Ubuntu (like Debian) already uses
flash-kernel to ensure that if a dtb needs to be accessible to the
bootloader, it's installed to an appropriate place. Putting other dtbs that
are *not* used by the bootloader on the currently-installed platform into
/boot is wrong from an FHS standpoint.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the kernel-team