[PATCH 3.13 056/160] pata_at91: fix ata_host_activate() failure handling

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.13.11.3 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>

commit 27aa64b9d1bd0d23fd692c91763a48309b694311 upstream.

Add missing clk_put() call to ata_host_activate() failure path.

Sergei says,

  "Hm, I have once fixed that (see that *if* (!ret)) but looks like a
   later commit 477c87e90853d136b188c50c0e4a93d01cad872e (ARM:
   at91/pata: use gpio_is_valid to check the gpio) broke it again. :-(
   Would be good if the changelog did mention that..."

Cc: Andrew Victor <linux at maxim.org.za>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
index d63ee8f..e3a49df 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
@@ -408,12 +408,13 @@ static int pata_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	host->private_data = info;
 
-	return ata_host_activate(host, gpio_is_valid(irq) ? gpio_to_irq(irq) : 0,
-			gpio_is_valid(irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt : NULL,
-			irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht);
+	ret = ata_host_activate(host, gpio_is_valid(irq) ? gpio_to_irq(irq) : 0,
+				gpio_is_valid(irq) ? ata_sff_interrupt : NULL,
+				irq_flags, &pata_at91_sht);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_put;
 
-	if (!ret)
-		return 0;
+	return 0;
 
 err_put:
 	clk_put(info->mck);
-- 
1.9.1