[PATCH 3.13 013/160] tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.13.11.3 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>

commit 521c42990e9d561ed5ed9f501f07639d0512b3c9 upstream.

tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is
possible or not. It does this as the first check:

	if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
		return false;

Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is
useable. Check for false instead.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel at lists.linaro.org
Cc: fweisbec at gmail.com
Cc: Arvind.Chauhan at arm.com
Cc: linaro-networking at linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 162b03a..425bfae 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 			    struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 {
-	if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
+	if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
 		return false;
 
 	return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);
-- 
1.9.1