[3.13.y.z extended stable] Patch "tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()" has been added to staging queue
Kamal Mostafa
kamal at canonical.com
Tue Jun 10 16:37:30 UTC 2014
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled
tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()
to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y.z extended stable tree
which can be found at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.13.y-queue
This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.13.11.3.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please
reply to this email.
For more information about the 3.13.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable
Thanks.
-Kamal
------
>From a7a150dca33ba90ecf23eb27b055c1a3267cb263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:54:37 +0530
Subject: tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()
commit 521c42990e9d561ed5ed9f501f07639d0512b3c9 upstream.
tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is
possible or not. It does this as the first check:
if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
return false;
Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is
useable. Check for false instead.
[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel at lists.linaro.org
Cc: fweisbec at gmail.com
Cc: Arvind.Chauhan at arm.com
Cc: linaro-networking at linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 162b03a..425bfae 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
struct clock_event_device *newdev)
{
- if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
+ if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
return false;
return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);
--
1.9.1
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list