3.13 DKMS package review
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Jan 7 13:12:49 UTC 2014
On 01/07/2014 05:40 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> tl;dr I have been reviewing the automated DKMS package testing. After
> fixing a couple of the packages I believe we are now in a position to
> call v3.13 good enough for the main archive.
>
> The DKMS testing for the trusty release pocket kernel (v3.12) shows the
> following failures:
>
> FailedBuild openswan_modules_dkms
> FailedBuild open_vm_tools_dkms
> FailedBuild oss4_dkms
> FailedBuild pvcam_dkms
> FailedBuild r8168_dkms
> FailedBuild speakup
>
> The equivalent testing for the CKT PPA trusty kernel (v3.13) shows the
> following failures:
>
> FailedBuild openswan_modules_dkms
> FailedBuild open_vm_tools_dkms
> FailedBuild openvswitch_datapath_dkms
> FailedBuild oss4_dkms
> FailedBuild pvcam_dkms
> FailedBuild r8168_dkms
> FailedBuild speakup
>
> The only additional failure is openvswitch_datapath, the changes here
> are currently being worked with upstream but I have confirmed with the
> server team that they are not relying on any of the additional features.
>
> I personally have been running these kernels on various kit here without
> incident. I therefore propose we can release the v3.13 kernel out of the
> PPA into the archive.
>
> -apw
>
When I looked on Friday fglrx was still broken, so I hassled Alberto on
IRC. He said he would fix it this week which I assume must have
happened. So, +1 from me.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list