[3.8.y.z extended stable] Patch "EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path" has been added to staging queue

Kamal Mostafa kamal at canonical.com
Mon Feb 24 19:51:06 UTC 2014


This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path

to the linux-3.8.y-queue branch of the 3.8.y.z extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.8.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.8.13.19.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.8.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

------

>From c328574b6e793f3b567d4673d57f918b47ec212a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:15:00 +0100
Subject: EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path

commit cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 upstream.

We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when
we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period
(edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec.

On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been
initialized already.

Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391457913-881-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
 drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index ab5341c..858945e 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -558,7 +558,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req)
  *
  *		called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
  */
-static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
+static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec,
+				bool init)
 {
 	edac_dbg(0, "\n");

@@ -566,7 +567,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
 	if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
 		return;

-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+	if (init)
+		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+
 	mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
 }

@@ -610,7 +613,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value)
 	list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
 		mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);

-		edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value);
+		edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false);
 	}

 	mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
@@ -766,7 +769,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
 		/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
 		mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;

-		edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
+		edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true);
 	} else {
 		mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
 	}
--
1.8.3.2





More information about the kernel-team mailing list