[3.5.y.z extended stable] Patch "EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path" has been added to staging queue
Luis Henriques
luis.henriques at canonical.com
Fri Feb 21 12:59:47 UTC 2014
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled
EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
to the linux-3.5.y-queue branch of the 3.5.y.z extended stable tree
which can be found at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.5.y-queue
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please
reply to this email.
For more information about the 3.5.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable
Thanks.
-Luis
------
>From 15cd584da4ea43e6941b684b27529995edbc62c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:15:00 +0100
Subject: EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
commit cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 upstream.
We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when
we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period
(edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec.
On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been
initialized already.
Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391457913-881-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
[ luis: backported to 3.5: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index de5ba86e..5d4321e 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -483,7 +483,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req)
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
*/
-static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
+static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec,
+ bool init)
{
debugf0("%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -491,7 +492,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+ if (init)
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+
queue_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
}
@@ -551,7 +554,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value)
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, (unsigned long) value);
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, (unsigned long) value, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
@@ -700,7 +703,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true);
} else {
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
}
--
1.9.0
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list