[PATCH Quantal] UBUNTU: SAUCE: Bluetooth: Add support for 04ca:2007

Jesse Sung jesse.sung at canonical.com
Mon Mar 11 09:58:26 UTC 2013


2013/3/11 Stefan Bader <stefan.bader at canonical.com>:
> On 11.03.2013 07:12, Adam Lee wrote:
>> BugLink: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153448
>>
>> These devices require external patchram firmware to work.
>>
>> T:  Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#=  3 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
>> D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
>> P:  Vendor=04ca ProdID=2007 Rev=01.12
>> S:  Manufacturer=Broadcom Corp
>> S:  Product=BCM43142A0
>> S:  SerialNumber=20689DD16A22
>> C:  #Ifs= 4 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=0mA
>> I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>> I:  If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none)
>> I:  If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adam Lee <adam.lee at canonical.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>
> Where does this patch come from? I tried to find it upstream and in linux-next
> but could not find it.
> Since this is for Quantal, there should be a bit more information. Like why only
> Quantal? Has the patch sent upstream? What is the status?
> Looking at the patch it is simple, has little chance of regression and so is
> something suitable for SRU, but for a SRU you should explain a bit more as I as
> a reviewer do not have more information than is in the email or the bug report.
> My main concern would be upstreaming because that way a patch cannot get lost
> (or via upstream stable may get into more releases than just the one the SRU is
> for). There could be a good reason why this doe not apply here but just from
> looking at the patch I do not know. ;)

Hi Stefan,

This patch would not be accepted by upstream since it depends on the
patchram stuff
which is a SAUCE in ubuntu kernel. The discussions about this patchram
interim solution
can be found at
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1065400

Thanks,
Jesse




More information about the kernel-team mailing list