ACK: [Precise][Quantal][Raring][Saucy][PATCH 0/1] Revert "serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of

[Brad Figg]

On 07/01/2013 12:15 PM, Luis Henriques wrote:
> joseph.salisbury at canonical.com writes:
> 
>> From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury at canonical.com>
>>
>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190967
>>
>>
>> == SRU Justification ==
>> Commit 8d2f8cd introduced a regression in v3.9-rc3.  This regression made it's way into the upstream stable trees and propegated down to Ubuntu stable releases.  This bug prevents printers from working when using teh NetMos Technology 9835 controller.  This commit will also be reverted in upstream Mainline and Stable:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/1/364 
>>
>>
>> == Fix ==
>> Revert the following commit:
>> commit 8d2f8cd424ca0b99001f3ff4f5db87c4e525f366
>> Author: Wang YanQing <udknight at gmail.com>
>> Date:   Fri Mar 1 11:47:20 2013 +0800
>>
>>     serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller
>>
>>
>> == Test Case ==
>> A test kernel was built with commit 8d2f8cd reverted, which resolved the bug.
>>
>>
>>
>> Joseph Salisbury (1):
>>   Revert "serial: 8250_pci: add support for another kind of NetMos
>>     Technology PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller"
>>
>>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c |    4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
> 
> Stable trees are already reverting this commit as a regression has
> been reported both by Joe (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/1/359) and
> another unhappy user (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/30/32).
> 
> Since its a regression, it probably doesn't make sense to wait for the
> stable updates, hence my ACK.
> 
> Cheers,
> 

We are starting a new cycle next week. Will the revert hit the stable trees
before then? If so, we'll pick it up from that.

-- 
Brad Figg brad.figg at canonical.com http://www.canonical.com