NAK: [precise/quantal][sru] pull-request: fsnotify: simplify locking

[Tim Gardner]

On 01/04/2013 07:03 AM, Chris J Arges wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 06:24 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> Chris - I hate to be a giant pain in your ass, but I think this patch
>> set requires a new bug report. We missed the packaging window so I can't
>> rebase the original series out of existence, plus there is one extra
>> patch in this new series that again messes with locking order which
>> deserves regression testing.
>>
>> rtg
> 
> Ok I'll create a new bug report and new SRU.
> 
> Overall is this pull-request OK with the reverts + new patches? I'll
> change the branch name before resubmitting, but want to be sure I have
> all my i's crossed and t's dotted.
> 
> I've run the quantal patches for most of the day a few days ago, but I
> can run a few VM's over the weekend as well with the test running after
> rebuilding.
> 
> --chris
> 

The pull request was fine with the reverts (which are now required).

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com