Mainline Build v3.13-rc4

Andy Whitcroft apw at canonical.com
Mon Dec 23 17:25:42 UTC 2013


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:21:54PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Sune Mølgaard wrote:
> > Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > >On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:13:44AM +0100, Sune Mølgaard wrote:
> > >>Hiya,
> > >>
> > >>Sorry to say, but no, the build is *not* complete, as errors occurred,
> > >>preventing the build from completing *successfully*.
> > >
> > >It completed.  In failure yes, but it completed.
> > >
> > >-apw
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > Well, as you will note by the asterisks, I agree the the build
> > process completed, though not not successfully. Hence, I posited
> > that "the build", i.e. the building of the expected packages", did
> > not.
> > 
> > I shall be happy to engage in a spirited discussion of the dual
> > semantic meanings of the word "build" employed in my statement, but
> > would you be so kind as to produce the desired packages in the
> > meantime?
> 
> -rc4 does not build due to a bug in the upstream source itself leading
> to the FTBFS you see.  I believe they have fixed it in later releases,
> and -rc5 should build.
> 
> These are debugging builds to find and catch such failures; they are
> not manual builds as such and so build using whatever upstream produces.

Looks like -rc5 worked ok.

-apw




More information about the kernel-team mailing list