[3.11.y.z extended stable] Patch "drm/ttm: Fix memory type compatibility check" has been added to staging queue
Luis Henriques
luis.henriques at canonical.com
Thu Dec 5 11:23:41 UTC 2013
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled
drm/ttm: Fix memory type compatibility check
to the linux-3.11.y-queue branch of the 3.11.y.z extended stable tree
which can be found at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.11.y-queue
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please
reply to this email.
For more information about the 3.11.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable
Thanks.
-Luis
------
>From 39fb5259f8c09d1d3593da5244fec5c942e0d41e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:02:19 -0700
Subject: drm/ttm: Fix memory type compatibility check
commit 59c8e66378fb78adbcd05f0d09783dde6fef282b upstream.
Also check the busy placements before deciding to move a buffer object.
Failing to do this may result in a completely unneccessary move within a
single memory type.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob at vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index cb9dd67..eb96c21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -993,24 +993,32 @@ out_unlock:
return ret;
}
-static int ttm_bo_mem_compat(struct ttm_placement *placement,
- struct ttm_mem_reg *mem)
+static bool ttm_bo_mem_compat(struct ttm_placement *placement,
+ struct ttm_mem_reg *mem,
+ uint32_t *new_flags)
{
int i;
if (mem->mm_node && placement->lpfn != 0 &&
(mem->start < placement->fpfn ||
mem->start + mem->num_pages > placement->lpfn))
- return -1;
+ return false;
for (i = 0; i < placement->num_placement; i++) {
- if ((placement->placement[i] & mem->placement &
- TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) &&
- (placement->placement[i] & mem->placement &
- TTM_PL_MASK_MEM))
- return i;
+ *new_flags = placement->placement[i];
+ if ((*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) &&
+ (*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < placement->num_busy_placement; i++) {
+ *new_flags = placement->busy_placement[i];
+ if ((*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) &&
+ (*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM))
+ return true;
}
- return -1;
+
+ return false;
}
int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
@@ -1019,6 +1027,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
bool no_wait_gpu)
{
int ret;
+ uint32_t new_flags;
lockdep_assert_held(&bo->resv->lock.base);
/* Check that range is valid */
@@ -1029,8 +1038,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
/*
* Check whether we need to move buffer.
*/
- ret = ttm_bo_mem_compat(placement, &bo->mem);
- if (ret < 0) {
+ if (!ttm_bo_mem_compat(placement, &bo->mem, &new_flags)) {
ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, interruptible,
no_wait_gpu);
if (ret)
@@ -1040,7 +1048,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
* Use the access and other non-mapping-related flag bits from
* the compatible memory placement flags to the active flags
*/
- ttm_flag_masked(&bo->mem.placement, placement->placement[ret],
+ ttm_flag_masked(&bo->mem.placement, new_flags,
~TTM_PL_MASK_MEMTYPE);
}
/*
--
1.8.3.2
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list