[Acked/cmt] [Lucid CVE-2013-1860] USB: cdc-wdm: fix buffer overflow
Andy Whitcroft
apw at canonical.com
Tue Apr 16 12:40:44 UTC 2013
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:16:19PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum at suse.de>
>
> CVE-2013-1860
>
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156784
>
> The buffer for responses must not overflow.
> If this would happen, set a flag, drop the data and return
> an error after user space has read all remaining data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oliver at neukum.org>
> CC: stable at kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> (back ported from commit c0f5ecee4e741667b2493c742b60b6218d40b3aa)
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
> index 37f2899..6ca1363 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (usb, wdm_ids);
> #define WDM_READ 4
> #define WDM_INT_STALL 5
> #define WDM_POLL_RUNNING 6
> -
> +#define WDM_OVERFLOW 10
Odd, but follows upstream allocation.
> #define WDM_MAX 16
>
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ static void wdm_in_callback(struct urb *urb)
> {
> struct wdm_device *desc = urb->context;
> int status = urb->status;
> + int length = urb->actual_length;
>
> spin_lock(&desc->iuspin);
>
> @@ -144,9 +145,17 @@ static void wdm_in_callback(struct urb *urb)
> }
>
> desc->rerr = status;
> - desc->reslength = urb->actual_length;
> - memmove(desc->ubuf + desc->length, desc->inbuf, desc->reslength);
> - desc->length += desc->reslength;
> + if (length + desc->length > desc->wMaxCommand) {
> + /* The buffer would overflow */
> + set_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags);
> + } else {
> + /* we may already be in overflow */
> + if (!test_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags)) {
> + memmove(desc->ubuf + desc->length, desc->inbuf, length);
> + desc->length += length;
> + desc->reslength = length;
> + }
> + }
Why this is not } else if (!test_bit(...)) { I do not know, but it
follows the upstream commit.
> wake_up(&desc->wait);
>
> set_bit(WDM_READ, &desc->flags);
> @@ -398,6 +407,11 @@ retry:
> rv = -ENODEV;
> goto err;
> }
> + if (test_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags)) {
> + clear_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags);
> + rv = -ENOBUFS;
> + goto err;
> + }
> i++;
> if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> if (!test_bit(WDM_READ, &desc->flags)) {
> @@ -440,6 +454,7 @@ retry:
> spin_unlock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
> goto retry;
> }
> +
> if (!desc->reslength) { /* zero length read */
> dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "%s: zero length - clearing WDM_READ\n", __func__);
> clear_bit(WDM_READ, &desc->flags);
> @@ -844,6 +859,7 @@ static int wdm_post_reset(struct usb_interface *intf)
> struct wdm_device *desc = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> int rv;
>
> + clear_bit(WDM_OVERFLOW, &desc->flags);
> rv = recover_from_urb_loss(desc);
> mutex_unlock(&desc->plock);
> return 0;
Looks to carry the essentials of the upstream commit to my eye.
Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw at canonical.com>
-apw
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list