[PATCH 034/102] Btrfs: don't drop path when printing out tree errors in scrub

[Luis Henriques]

3.5.7.10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik at fusionio.com>

commit d8fe29e9dea8d7d61fd140d8779326856478fc62 upstream.

A user reported a panic where we were panicing somewhere in
tree_backref_for_extent from scrub_print_warning.  He only captured the trace
but looking at scrub_print_warning we drop the path right before we mess with
the extent buffer to print out a bunch of stuff, which isn't right.  So fix this
by dropping the path after we use the eb if we need to.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik at fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason at fusionio.com>
[ luis: adjust context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index b223620..5aeffbe 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, struct scrub_block *sblock)
 	eb = path->nodes[0];
 	ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_extent_item);
 	item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, path->slots[0]);
-	btrfs_release_path(path);
 
 	if (ret & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) {
 		do {
@@ -401,7 +400,9 @@ static void scrub_print_warning(const char *errstr, struct scrub_block *sblock)
 				ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_level,
 				ret < 0 ? -1 : ref_root);
 		} while (ret != 1);
+		btrfs_release_path(path);
 	} else {
+		btrfs_release_path(path);
 		swarn.path = path;
 		iterate_extent_inodes(fs_info, found_key.objectid,
 					extent_item_pos, 1,
-- 
1.8.1.2