[PATCH 0/2] [P/omap4] debian.ti-omap4/control* housekeeping

Ricardo Salveti rsalveti at rsalveti.net
Thu Mar 22 19:16:37 UTC 2012


On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Tim Gardner <rtg.canonical at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 06:11 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote:
>>
>> A fix and a cleanup for debian.ti-omap4/control.stub&c:
>>
>> 1) make linux-ti-omap4-headers provide linux-headers (thus fixing packages
>> depending on it like dkms)
>>
>> 2) garbage collect unused entries
>>
>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960770
>>
>> Paolo Pisati (2):
>>   UBUNTU: linux-ti-omap4-headers provides linux-headers too
>>   UBUNTU: gargabe collect unused entries in control.stub.in
>>
>>  debian.ti-omap4/control.d/flavour-control.stub |    4 +-
>>  debian.ti-omap4/control.stub.in                |   61
>> +-----------------------
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Ricardo - I think the correct fix for this is to add omap4 specific
> recommends to dkms. Can you add this patch to dkms and give it a try ?

We could, but then the question is why this package should not provide
linux-headers?

I know it's not coming from the official tree, but as this will happen
with all the flavours we currently have (armada, ac100, linaro, etc).
It might be good to fix it for all by just expecting the
flavour-linux-headers to also provide linux-headers itself.

What do you say?

Thanks,
-- 
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo




More information about the kernel-team mailing list