Linux 3.2 in Debian 7.0

Pete Graner pgraner at canonical.com
Tue Jan 31 15:46:02 UTC 2012


On 01/30/2012 02:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:46:29AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Greg,
>>
>> We've decided to go with Linux 3.2 for the next Debian stable release,
>> so we'll be interested in a 3.2.y longterm series.  I believe there was
>> a volunteer from Ubuntu to look after that once you've had enough of it,
>> but I seem to have lost the relevant mail.
>
> I will not be handing any stable/longterm maintance over to anyone who
> does not have a _lot_ of kernel community experience, so that seems to
> rule out just about all Ubuntu developers at this point in time from
> what I can tell.

Greg, I'd be interested to know what the criteria is for "a _lot_ of 
kernel community experience". We are will to put in the time and effort, 
and if there are things we need to do I'd like to know what they are.

>
> As I think this will be a Debian/Ubuntu thing only, I don't know if
> keeping the kernel.org version around for any length of time is really
> going to help much out here, do you?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Thanks

~pete
-- 
Pete Graner - Ubuntu Kernel & QA Team Manager - <pgraner at canonical.com>
Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/




More information about the kernel-team mailing list