APPLIED: [PATCH 0/2][Lucid SRU] Fix i915 BUG due to unreferenced object

Steve Conklin sconklin at
Thu Sep 15 14:28:48 UTC 2011

On 09/15/2011 08:18 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Steve Conklin wrote:
>> The patches that these depended on have been reverted from the master
>> branch.
>> In the process of rebasing master-next with the Lucid master branch
>> which was
>> just prepared, I intentionally dropped these two patches.
>> If the set of patches which was dropped from the master branch is reapplied,
>> then these (or a similar fix) should be applied along with them.
>> The dropped patches are being trackeed in this bug:
> What needs to happen to make sure these patches do get reapplied before
> the next Lucid SRU kernel is prepped? Do they need to be sent to the
> list again?
Since these are all upstream stable patches, they don't have to go
through the ack process.

Someone needs to make sure that all of the required patches are included
in order to get us to what we think is a good stable end point, and
apply all those to master-next. Update the tracking bug linked above to
indicate that, and include that tracking bug in a buglink in the commits

They'll go back out in the next -proposed for another try


More information about the kernel-team mailing list