ACK: [PATCH oneiric] SRU: Bluetooth: Add support for Broadcom BCM20702A0

[Stefan Bader]

On 04.10.2011 13:17, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 04.10.2011 04:04, Jesse Sung wrote:
>> Already sent to upstream, and waiting for approval.
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/16570
>>
>> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854399
>>
>> SRU Justification:
>>
>> BCM20702A0 does not declare itself as a bluetooth device. Must add its ID to
>> btusb device table to make it work.
>>
>> From eed37e8a6c826738fd7d9bfd51dbea6187caca60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Wen-chien Jesse Sung <jesse.sung at canonical.com>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:48:42 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add a new entry (413c:8197) to device ID table
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen-chien Jesse Sung <jesse.sung at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index 513d462..6f6eab8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ static struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
>>      /* Frontline ComProbe Bluetooth Sniffer */
>>      { USB_DEVICE(0x16d3, 0x0002), .driver_info = BTUSB_SNIFFER },
>>
>> +    /* Broadcom BCM20702A0 */
>> +    { USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8197) },
>> +
>>      { }    /* Terminating entry */
>>  };
>>
> Looks limited and little risk
> 
> Acked-by: Stefan Bader <smb at canonical.com>
> 
Agree about the SAUCE. This is a bit border line of trying not to SRU things not
in upstream and simplicity, too.