[Natty-SRU] Lenovo x420s panel display corruption when mode-setting
Andy Whitcroft
apw at canonical.com
Mon Oct 3 13:23:24 UTC 2011
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:19:55PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Well its a vast and epic patch. I am left wondering whether this is
> a backport or a cherry-pick in this context, below its reported as a
> backport which implies it was modified, but you say here "as-is" implying
> the opposite.
[...]
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: add pipe/plane enable/disable functions
> >
> > Add plane enable/disable functions to prevent duplicated code and allow
> > us to easily check for plane enable/disable requirements (such as pipe
> > enable, plane status, pll status etc).
>
> It is clear that this description is inadequate if we are actually
> changing pipe init order. (Not that that is anything you should change
> as it _is_ the upstream commit description.) Bad Jesse.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >
> > (Backport to 2.6.38.y)
>
> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812638
> (backported from commit b24e71798871089da1a4ab049db2800afc1aac0c)
>
> "backported from" if its modified, "cherry-picked from" if its not ... ?
Ok, having talked to Jose a bit on IRC I am now able to answer my own
question. Actually this patch is the merge of _two_ upstream commits
only retaining one of the descriptions.
It is a merge of the two commits below:
commit 65993d64a31844ad444694efb2d159eb9c883e49
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue Jan 4 15:09:29 2011 -0800
drm/i915: don't enable plane, pipe and PLL prematurely
On Ironlake+ we need to enable these in a specific order.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
and:
commit b24e71798871089da1a4ab049db2800afc1aac0c
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue Jan 4 15:09:30 2011 -0800
drm/i915: add pipe/plane enable/disable functions
Add plane enable/disable functions to prevent duplicated code and allow
us to easily check for plane enable/disable requirements (such as pipe
enable, plane status, pll status etc).
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
If we try applying these onto the current natty head the first is a clean
cherry-pick, the second collised in context _only_ with the patch below,
keeping both sides gives us the combined commit on this thread:
commit bbeaf8811ba070fd186dfcabc957044c3a1149ac
Author: Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin at canonical.com>
Date: Wed Jun 22 09:49:34 2011 +0800
drm/i915: disable PCH ports if needed when disabling a CRTC
For me this should have been submitted as two patched as clearly the
change in the first one is a key component. From these discusssions it
seems that this improves things from 100% failure to ~10% failure on
boot. It looks a lot like the changes in the second patch, such as
waiting for vblank on enabling the pipes fixes that final 10%.
-apw
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list