[Oneiric][pull request] Update/consolidate nx-emu

Leann Ogasawara leann.ogasawara at canonical.com
Wed May 25 17:06:56 UTC 2011


On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 11:02 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 09:17 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > Applied to Oneiric master-next.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leann
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 14:04 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> The following changes since commit 1e9ed812fef72843c4cbd4a1dd5c248aff332184:
> >>
> >>    UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.39-3.9 (2011-05-20 09:53:38 +0100)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>    git://kernel.ubuntu.com/kees/ubuntu-oneiric.git master
> >>
> >> Ingo Molnar (2):
> >>        UBUNTU: ubuntu: nx-emu - i386: NX emulation
> >>        UBUNTU: ubuntu: nx-emu - i386: mmap randomization for executable mappings
> >>
> >> Kees Cook (8):
> >>        Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: nx-emu: further clarify dmesg reporting"
> >>        Revert "nx-emu: fix inverted report of disable_nx"
> >>        Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: nx-emu: use upstream ASLR when possible"
> >>        Revert "exec-randomization: brk away from exec rand area"
> >>        Revert "mmap randomization for executable mappings on 32-bit"
> >>        Revert "nx-emu: standardize boottime message prefix"
> >>        Revert "nx-emu: drop exec-shield sysctl, merge with disable_nx"
> >>        Revert "i386: NX emulation"
> >>
> >>   arch/x86/kernel/process.c |    6 +++---
> >>   mm/mmap.c                 |    6 +++---
> >>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> (The above delta between reverts and commits are comment clean-ups and one
> >> minor code position change for general clarification. Also, I made Ingo the
> >> author, since the bulk of the code is his work. Hopefully this won't
> >> complicate the delta review too badly.)
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> -Kees
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kees Cook
> >> Ubuntu Security Team
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Leann - I think you should just rebase the reverts out of existence 
> since they don't really have any historical relevance for Oneiric, 
> especially now that we'll never rebase against Natty again.

I was actually going to drop them when we rebased to 2.6.40-rc1.  But
I'm cool to do it now too.  I'll push in a bit.

Leann





More information about the kernel-team mailing list