CVE-2011-1016

[Stefan Bader]

On 03/30/2011 03:03 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Dann - thanks. Will you send these to stable at kernel.org ? A cursory check does
> not find them in 2.6.37.y
> 
> Stefan - the second patch is a cherry-pick of
> 45e4039c3aea597ede44a264cea322908cdedfe9 if you'd like to drop them into your
> stable tree.
> 
> I'll apply to Lucid and Maverick as CVE patches.
> 
> rtg
> 

I sort of expected both to be upstream somewhere (I did not have time yet to
check). So if those are upstream I actually would take both into the stable tree
(other longterm interest probably varies depending on which the changes apply
.32, .35 ... not sure how alive .37 is). There are likely a few more drm changes
coming as I need to pick up a few changes from the Debian folks as well.

-Stefan

> On 03/29/2011 03:23 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> hey,
>>   I backported the fixes for CVE-2011-1016 to Debian squeeze, so thought I'd
>> send you a copy for linux-2.6.32.y-drm33.z (it doesn't apply to
>> longterm-2.6.32).
>>
>> This is compile-tested only at this point - I don't have the hardware needed to
>> test.
>>
>>   r100.c         |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   r100_track.h   |    3 +++
>>   r300.c         |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   r300_reg.h     |    2 ++
>>   reg_srcs/r300  |    3 ---
>>   reg_srcs/r420  |    3 ---
>>   reg_srcs/rs600 |    3 ---
>>   reg_srcs/rv515 |    3 ---
>>   8 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
> 
>