[Dapper] Is L-R-M 2.6.15-57 available?

[Stefan Bader]

On 03/24/2011 12:17 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Brad Figg wrote:
>> On 03/23/2011 07:41 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2011 06:31 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>>>> I can find linux-source-2.6.15 (2.6.15-57.94) but can't find *15-57* in
>>>> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/restricted/l/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15/ .
>>>> Don't we need to build *15-57* packages?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Its in https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=dapper awaiting a pocket copy to -proposed.
>>>
>>
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15
>>
>> Shows that it's been in proposed for 15 hours now.
> 
> Thanks, but it is 2.6.15-55 rather than 2.6.15-57.
> 
> The "linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 - 2.6.15.12-57.7" source package in
> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ppa/+packages shows
> linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15-55-686_2.6.15.12-57.7_i386.deb .
> 
> I was assuming that two $ABI part in
> 
>   linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15-$ABI-686_2.6.15.$VER1-$ABI.$VER2_i386.deb
> 
> are always identical and are updated in sync with linux-image-2.6.15-$ABI
> updates.
> 
> Is 2.6.15-*55*-686_2.6.15.12-*57*.7 expected versioning?
> 
> .... Oh, it was updated with right ABI number 10 minutes ago.
> Will be corrected shortly.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
Yes, I realized that I did not update all the places that needed change. Sorry
about that. The Dapper version unfortunately is different and that is easy to
forget.

-Stefan