Stable derivative branch handling

Andy Whitcroft apw at canonical.com
Mon Jun 13 14:16:10 UTC 2011


On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:02:22PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> On 06/13/2011 03:46 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > 
> > To this end once the main distro kernel tree are prepared the kernel
> > stable team will announce their availability to the derivative branch
> > maintainers.  This will indicate that the master branches are now ready
> > for rebasing onto where that is appropriate.  The derivative maintainers
> > will then rebase if required and determine if their branch has anything
> > worthy of an upload.  If so they will reply to the announcement adding
> > their branch to the versions to pushed this cycle.  The stable team will
> > then handle closing and uploading this branch with the main branches.
> > If the derivative branches are not ready in time for upload, they will
> > simply slip to the next cadance round.
> > 
> > The current derivative branch maintainers are:
> > 
> >  - smb: Lucid -ec2
> >  - ppisati: everything arm
> 
> 
> what about all the others non-rebasable branches?
> 
> so far there's only one arm rebasable branch (lucid/mvl-dove) vs 4 arm
> branches (lucid/imx51, [maverick|natty|oneiric]/ti-omap4) that need to
> be manually maintained, but i don't think we can do much about them (and
> i fear the number of these branches will increase in the future).
> 
> other than that, i'm ok with it.

If you have non-rebase branches you are maintaining (and you do) then
when the master branches are ready and announced that is an appropriate
time to reply and also indicate which of those branches have patches
which warrent uploading, do indicate if there are any CVEs as well.
That should have been clearer in this write up.

-apw




More information about the kernel-team mailing list