APPLIED: [2.6.32+drm33-longterm] Linux 2.6.32.43+drm33.19

[Stefan Bader]

On 14.07.2011 17:11, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 09:07 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> On 14.07.2011 14:51, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/810425
>>
>>
>> Seems, Tim, you just dropped the new xen patch. OK, I don't know
>> exactly what the preference for stable is, but we may want to get
>> back to be same as upstream...
>>
>> -Stefan
>>
> 
> Indeed I did as I saw no reason to revert the revert only to apply the revert
> yet again.
> 
> I'm not sure I see the value in being the same as upstream stable. In fact,
> we're not identical as soon as we revert _any_ patch that has arrived via stable.
> 
> rtg

Though reverting the revert (which was reverting an upstream stable patch) would
make the kernel be the same as upstream. And then adding the additional (partial
revert) fixes the breakage. I agree it sounds confusing...