[PATCH 3/3] UBUNTU: Add the linux-tools package to TI OMAP4

[Stefan Bader]

On 01/24/2011 02:58 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> On 01/24/2011 03:50 AM, Bryan Wu wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu at canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>>  meta-source/debian/control.common |    8 ++++++++
>>>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta-source/debian/control.common b/meta-source/debian/control.common
>>> index d8b7f12..be7ad0c 100644
>>> --- a/meta-source/debian/control.common
>>> +++ b/meta-source/debian/control.common
>>> @@ -5,3 +5,11 @@ Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team <kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>  Standards-Version: 3.6.1
>>>  Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.13.19), debhelper (>= 5), gawk
>>>  Vcs-Git: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git-repos/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick-meta.git
>>> +
>>
>> Ok, in general. But I find the naming scheme not too intuitive:
>>> +Package: linux-tools-omap4
>>                         ^ no ti-
>>> +Architecture: armel
>>> +Section: metapackages
>>> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, linux-ti-omap4-tools-${kernel-abi-version}
>>                                    ^ with ti- and why not
>> 				   linux-tools-(ti-)omap4-...
>>> +Description: Linux kernel versioned Tools
>>> + This package will always depend on the latest Linux kernel versioned tools
>>> + available. The Ubuntu patches have been applied.
> 
> This is because where we put names at the right hand end they are
> flavour names.  And for better or worse the flavour name here is omap4
> and not ti-omap4.
> 
> -apw
Yeah, I was more targetting the linux-ti-omap-tools name of the binary which
seemed to be odd. I thought we otherwise had been using
linux-tools-<flavour>-... but I may be remembering incorrectly.

-Stefan