[Natty] [PATCH] OMAP3630: PM: don't warn the user with a trace in case of PM34XX_ERRATUM
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Feb 1 18:04:11 UTC 2011
On 01/31/2011 08:24 PM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andy Whitcroft<apw at canonical.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:42:25PM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>> Is this really necessary ? While the WARN_ONCE() is a bit more
>>> verbose, it has no deleterious impact. We'd rather not carry any
>>> more delta from upstream then we have to.
>> I am inclined to suggest this is a good thing as we will be triggering
>> apport for something which essentially is unfixable. I suspect that as
>> this will also trigger kerneloops that upstream will take the change.
>> Indeed, it sounds like it will go upstream from the rest of the thread.
> Patch queued at Kevin Hilman's for_2.6.39/pm-misc branch, so it should
> be upstream soon, but not for 38.
I agree with Andy's reasoning.
Applied and pushed
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team