[PATCH 2/2] UBUNTU: SAUCE: add ricoh 0xe823 pci id.

[Brad Figg]

On 02/14/2011 05:20 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 11:57 PM, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>> Patch was submitted upstream, https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/11/309
>>
>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717435
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manoj Iyer<manoj.iyer at canonical.com>
>>
> This patch is not (yet) upstream. We cannot SRU patches before they are
> mainline. Please submit again, when it is in Linus tree.
>
>> This patch was tested on Lenovo x220 and was reported to work.
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c |    8 ++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
>> index e021431..c53b22d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
>> @@ -415,6 +415,14 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] __devinitdata = {
>>   	},
>>
>>   	{
>> +		.vendor         = PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
>> +		.device         = 0xe823,
>> +		.subvendor      = PCI_ANY_ID,
>> +		.subdevice      = PCI_ANY_ID,
>> +		.driver_data    = (kernel_ulong_t)&sdhci_ricoh_mmc,
>> +	},
>> +
>> +	{
>>   		.vendor		= PCI_VENDOR_ID_ENE,
>>   		.device		= PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENE_CB712_SD,
>>   		.subvendor	= PCI_ANY_ID,
>
>

Stefan,

I disagree. I think it would be quite easy to look at this mailing lists
archive to find examples of where we have taken SRU patches before they
have hit Linus' tree.

Also, given the amount of hardware enablement being done by other parts
of the company, we will be continuing to take patches to Maverick as
long as necessary.


Manjo,

Acked-by: Brad Figg <brad.figg at canonical.com>

-- 
Brad Figg brad.figg at canonical.com http://www.canonical.com