[Oneiric, Natty, Maverick, Lucid SRU] Link libbfd statically

Ben Hutchings ben at decadent.org.uk
Tue Aug 16 15:58:14 UTC 2011


On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 14.08.2011 18:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 11:38 +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
[...]
> >> Actually, having said this, maybe the better solution is to modify
> >> the build dependencies to cause the compile to have
> >> HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE set. That way we do not need to carry a
> >> modification to the makefile which likely breaks...
> > 
> > You *must* set HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE; see Debian bug #606050.
> > 
> > Ben.
> > 
> > 
> Ah ok. Well I saw that setting that option preventing any linkage against
> libbfd. Which was what the proposed patch caused by accidentally breaking all
> the compile time tests.
> What I was not sure of was whether using libiberty only instead of libbfd has
> any functional drawback. But if there are actually license problems involved[1],
> then there does not seem to be a way around only using libiberty.
 
AFAIK, perf only needs a C++ symbol demangling function from one
or other of these libraries, and either version works just as well as
the other.

> So the change would be like attached for Oneiric. The milage for other releases
> will vary. The only thing that makes me wonder whether this correct is that ldd
> on the resulting binary shows no reference to libiberty.
[...]

I'm not sure about Ubuntu but in Debian binutils-dev only provides a
static libiberty.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert Camus




More information about the kernel-team mailing list