[PATCH] wireless-crda: port to libnl3

[Tim Gardner]

On 08/09/2011 06:48 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:19:04AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> wireless-crda is a combination of 2 upstream repositories which can
>> be a little confusing. I've fixed the Vcs-Git information in
>> debian/control, but you also must have the correct branch checked
>> out.
>
> Ah, OK, I may have missed that.
>
>> How about the 2 attached patches for the oneiric branch libnl-3.0
>> support? I'll see about getting these changes propagated upstream.
>
>> > From 6c38ee86044366f08799d1bac98b6c2f120f9115 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com>
>> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:52:59 -0600
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add support for libnl-3.0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com>
>
> Looks good to me.  I don't know that a separate CONFIG_LIBNL30
> definition is necessary since it just does the same as CONFIG_LIBNL20,
> but it also obviously isn't harmful.
>
>> > From 3064250fd65480aaa455cd02008ecbb624ef7d5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com>
>> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:39:06 -0600
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Ubuntu-1.14
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   debian/changelog |    9 +++++++++
>>   regulatory.bin   |  Bin 3224 ->  3268 bytes
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
>> index 74c97b9..5f79308 100644
>> --- a/debian/changelog
>> +++ b/debian/changelog
>> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
>> +wireless-crda (1.14) oneiric; urgency=low
>> +
>> +  * Updated wireless-regdb to master-2011-04-28
>> +    wireless-regdb: update regulatory.bin based on preceding changes
>> +    Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)
>> +    regdb: fix moinmoin plugin license
>> +
>> + -- Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com>   Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:35:36 -0600
>> +
>>   wireless-crda (1.13) natty; urgency=low
>>
>>     * Updated wireless-regdb to master-2010-11-24
>
> I'll take your word for it on this, and the upstream update is fine at
> this point in the cycle; the libnl3 change should be mentioned in
> debian/changelog as well, though.
>
> Thanks,
>

Done, uploaded.

-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com