Fwd: [Build #1964751] armel build of linux-linaro 2.6.35-1006.11 in ubuntu maverick RELEASE

[John Rigby]

Tim,

I really messed things up by turning do_tools on without a native build 
test.  I will never do that again.

I'm working on a 1006.12 with the kernel-wedge workaround hack reverted 
and fixed the right way and tools compiling properly.

John

On 09/18/2010 01:03 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> John - I have a test build running based on 
> 'git://kernel.ubuntu.com/rtg/ubuntu-maverick.git linaro'. I'm about to 
> hop a plane for Taipei so don't have time to finish the test build. 
> Please have a look and send a pull request if you have to make any 
> changes. I'll likely resurface sometime Monday.
>
> rtg
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Build #1964751] armel build of linux-linaro 2.6.35-1006.11 
> in ubuntu    maverick RELEASE
> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:32:43 -0000
> From: Launchpad Buildd System <noreply at launchpad.net>
> Reply-To: Launchpad Buildd System <noreply at launchpad.net>
> To: tim.gardner at canonical.com
>
>
>  * Source Package: linux-linaro
>  * Version: 2.6.35-1006.11
>  * Architecture: armel
>  * Archive: ubuntu primary archive
>  * Component: main
>  * State: Failed to build
>  * Duration: 9 hours 30 minutes
>  * Build Log: 
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro/2.6.35-1006.11/+build/1964751/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-armel.linux-linaro_2.6.35-1006.11_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz 
>
>  * Builder: https://launchpad.net/builders/satinash
>  * Source: 
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro/2.6.35-1006.11
>
>
>
> If you want further information about this situation, feel free to
> contact a member of the Launchpad Buildd Administrators team.
>
> -- 
> armel build of linux-linaro 2.6.35-1006.11 in ubuntu maverick RELEASE
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro/2.6.35-1006.11/+build/1964751 
>
>
>