[Maverick] [ti-omap4] SRU: A fixing for default boot on HDMI with ES2.0
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Thu Oct 7 07:58:52 UTC 2010
On 10/07/2010 05:26 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Oliver Grawert<ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> sigh ... gmail ... forwarding to actually go to the kernel team list ...
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Oliver Grawert<ogra at ubuntu.com>
>> Date: 2010/10/7
>> Subject: Re: [Maverick] [ti-omap4] SRU: A fixing for default boot on HDMI
>> with ES2.0
>> To: Bryan Wu<bryan.wu at canonical.com>
>> 2010/10/6 Bryan Wu<bryan.wu at canonical.com>
>>> SRU Justification:
>>> Impact: Some SYNC_LOST_DIGIT errors are still reported with some screens
>>> by display underflows issues.
>>> Fix: This patch fix this issue with the following x-loader patch.
>>> Testcase: Tested the patched kernel and x-loader on Pandaboard ES2.1
>>> This issue is gone.
>>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655746
>>> Note: Be careful that this patch has a dependency on a x-loader patch.
>>> Both patches shall be integrated simultaneously.
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> Tim Gardner (1):
>>> UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.35-903.14
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/roc/ubuntu-maverick ti-omap4
>>> Mythri P K (1):
>>> OMAP4:DSS:HDMI:Fix for default boot on HDMI with ES2.0
>>> drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c | 7 +++++++
>>> drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h | 3 +++
>>> drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> I dont see this fix in the recent kernel upload note that this is essential
>> else ES2.0 pandaboard will not boot anymore ...
>> ...according to the IRC conversation below it was merged though, is there
>> just a changelog entry missing (we uploaded the matching x-loader patch so
>> booting will be broken unless the kernel patch is in too) ?
>> <ogra> tgardner, so if cooloneys patch hits the git tree, feel free to
>> upload, i just pushed the x-loader patch
>> <tgardner> ogra: in progress
>> <ogra_ac> tgardner, err, bryan just says its not in the git tree yet
>> <tgardner> ogra: like I said, its in progress. I'll get it pushed soon, then
>> upload thereafter.
>> <ogra_ac> ah, it just only hit the ML
>> <ogra_ac> ok, thanks
>> * ogra_ac calms down a bit :)
>> <tgardner> ogra, rsalveti: pushed (you'll need to rebase). I'll upload in a
>> <rsalveti> tgardner: cool, thanks a lot
> Ok, it seems the fix is in as we got it at the kernel tree, but
> probably missing the changelog entry because tgardner rebase it,
> without updating the changes.
> We can test tomorrow, but would be nice to have a confirmation from tgardner.
Doh! That is exactly what happened. Sorry about that.
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team