Lucid meta in pre-proposed
apw at canonical.com
Fri Oct 1 07:33:31 UTC 2010
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:42:42PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Is there a reason why we can't have a Lucid meta package in
> pre-proposed? Otherwise its difficult to track ABI jumps in the
> Lucid pre-proposed kernel. If we can't have 2 packages of the same
> name in 2 release pockets, then we'll likely have to have a separate
> pre-proposed PPA for each release.
Normally there should be one if we handle linux-meta correctly, but
someone needs to add the ABI bump into meta branch UNRELEASED. I
suspect we could handle it automatically with some work.
More information about the kernel-team